{"id":521,"date":"2005-02-10T14:14:55","date_gmt":"2005-02-10T21:14:55","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-02-10T14:26:55","modified_gmt":"2005-02-10T21:26:55","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/node\/521\/","title":{"rendered":"Pulling Numbers Out of My Ass"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230;but at least they make SENSE.<\/p>\n<p>(the source of this discussion is an interesting article that appeared on the New York Times. Signe posted it integrally <a href=\"http:\/\/forums.f13.net\/index.php?topic=2103.0\">here<\/a>. There&#8217;s interesting stuff to read aside the vague references to the numbers I discuss here)<\/p>\n<p>You probably all know <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mmogchart.com\/\">SirBruce<\/a>. This is a discussion on F13 where I guess World of Warcraft numbers. And, of course, I&#8217;m never wrong:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><b>SirBruce<\/b>:<br \/>\nWell, they never mention subscriber numbers, unfortunately. I knew about the 700K figure a few days ago, as well as the fact it was getting lots of playtime in the Korean cybercafes.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d say there are at least 500K subscribers now. Potentially 100-200K more if you count Korea. But unfortunately, that&#8217;s only an estimate..<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So WHY you keep estimating BADLY?<br \/>\n700k of box sales are EXCLUSIVELY for the american release. You assume a 200k vanishing as a churn rate?<br \/>\nIn Korea there are 100k loggin in at the same time. How it&#8217;s possible that this number is EQUAL to ALL the subscribers?<\/p>\n<p>A believeable estimate, right now and with the data we have, is that the american subscribers are at 600k if they sold 700k (and the box sales for <a href=\"http:\/\/ve3d.ign.com\/articles\/586\/586606p1.html\">the LAST WEEK<\/a> still put WoW just behind HL2 and The Sims2). And 150-250k, at least, for Korea.<\/p>\n<p>With the European release they&#8217;ll break easily 1M.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><b>SirBruce<\/b>:<br \/>\n&#8220;It appears that World of Warcraft is on a pace to generate at least $200 million in subscription revenue this year, in addition to more than $50 million in retail sales.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>$200 million \/ ($15\/month * 12 months) = 1,111,111 subscribers per month on average. Now, that&#8217;s probably not possible, because they only sold 700K copies; it&#8217;s the payments from the cybercafes that distort this. So we still can&#8217;t be sure how many people are playing in South Korea, but at least it&#8217;s putting us in the ballpark.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>No, it&#8217;s probably not possible just because you have a very personal idea even of the basic math.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><b>Haemish<\/b>:<br \/>\nWait, isn&#8217;t the general consensus that only 1\/8th of all subscribers are logged in nightly? So if that is even remotely true, they would somehow have over 2 million subscribers?<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Because I believe most numbers aren&#8217;t correct.<\/p>\n<p>I do not believe that each night 250k are logged in. Instead I believe they reached that at peak during the holiday. About Korea I don&#8217;t know but it&#8217;s not impossible to guess the numbers for NA and my bet is that they are at 600k.<\/p>\n<p>In general the proportion is 1\/4 &#8211; 1\/5 anyway. Eve-Online has 13k at peak and 50k+ subs. DAoC, back then, 60k at peak and 250k in total<br \/>\nEverquest went above 100k logged in with 450k in total or so<\/p>\n<p>All these examples are America+Europe, so the peak log ins are smoothed. While WoW has a good 95% of the playerbase completely focused in a few timezones. This means that there are MORE peoples logged in and less resulting total subs. So it&#8217;s probably 1\/3 &#8211; 1\/4. With a rough 150k or more logging in at peak we have about 600k.<\/p>\n<p>This is an estimation, but an estimation that makes sense. Plus the game is still on the top three, while, as an example, EQ2 *vanished* after the first week.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230;but at least they make SENSE. (the source of this discussion is an interesting article that appeared on the New York Times. Signe posted it integrally here. There&#8217;s interesting stuff to read aside the vague references to the numbers I discuss here) You probably all know SirBruce. This is a discussion on F13 where I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[16],"class_list":["post-521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-subscriptions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=521"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/521\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}