{"id":1976,"date":"2010-06-10T10:09:29","date_gmt":"2010-06-10T17:09:29","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-06-10T11:16:28","modified_gmt":"2010-06-10T18:16:28","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/node\/1976\/","title":{"rendered":"How to start a book? (I don&#8217;t like the first word of &#8216;The Way of Kings&#8217;)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It seems there&#8217;s some stir today as Tor begins to promote Sanderson&#8217;s latest and most ambitious epic. I&#8217;m enjoying the atmosphere, honestly. In spite of all the seemingly negative things I&#8217;ve written about Sanderson I still said I plan to buy the book on day 1 and read it. I also expect at the very least to enjoy it. But if it doesn&#8217;t offer something that stands apart the next volumes will probably sit back on the reading pile.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, part of the promotion are the first 50 pages or so of the book, <a href=\"http:\/\/aidanmoher.com\/random_stuff\/way-of-kings-excerpt\/the-way-of-kings-by-brandon-sanderson.html\">right now<\/a>. Or at least Prologue and Prelude, the rest requires some sort of registration.<\/p>\n<p>I haven&#8217;t read that, and I will likely wait for the full book before commenting, but that first word is a very bad way to start a book, especially for something that is going to span 10 books.<\/p>\n<p>This isn&#8217;t really criticism to Sanderson, it&#8217;s just that I always thought it&#8217;s awful to open a book with a first name. <i>&#8220;Kakak rounded a rocky stone ridge&#8221;<\/i>. Why should I care? First names are something you acquire. They are meaningful when they define someone you know. But throwing the name before everything else is like an unnatural thrust into a character that expects you to know him already. It&#8217;s like forcing familiarity to the reader without earning that familiarity.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s make examples. I have recently written about Pynchon, so take Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>A screaming comes across the sky.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s a hell of way to start a book. It sets the tone and definitely lacerates the curtain to let the reader in. (I appreciate the present tense)<\/p>\n<p>Another of Pynchon I have here:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>&#8220;Now single up all lines!&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Yeah! Let&#8217;s fly!<\/p>\n<p>Philip Roth:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>She was so deeply imbedded in my consciousness that for the first year of school I seem to have believed that each of my teachers was my mother in disguise.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>I guess literary guys know how to begin their books.<\/p>\n<p>James Joyce, Finnegans Wake.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam&#8217;s, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>No comment.<\/p>\n<p>Gene Wolfe&#8217;s New Sun:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>&#8220;It is possible I already had some presentiment of my future.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>It couldn&#8217;t have set the tone and eccentricity any better.<\/p>\n<p>David Copperfield:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that station will be held by anybody else, these pages must show.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Well yes, I&#8217;m unfair. You can&#8217;t beat that.<\/p>\n<p>R. Scott Bakker:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>One cannot rise walls against what has been forgotten.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s Bakker. It&#8217;s him telling it&#8217;s him. &#8220;Hey, it&#8217;s me.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Glen Cook: <\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>There were prodigies and portents enough, One-Eye says.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>This gets a first name, but as you see the precedence is given to what is being said, which fits.<\/p>\n<p>Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>Howard Roark laughed.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>OK. First name. BUT IT IS AYN RAND. If she isn&#8217;t allowed to open a book with a first name than no one else can.<\/p>\n<p>Which naturally leads to Terry Goodkind:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>It was an odd-looking vine.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>&#8230;Huh?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It seems there&#8217;s some stir today as Tor begins to promote Sanderson&#8217;s latest and most ambitious epic. I&#8217;m enjoying the atmosphere, honestly. In spite of all the seemingly negative things I&#8217;ve written about Sanderson I still said I plan to buy the book on day 1 and read it. I also expect at the very [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[5,33],"class_list":["post-1976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-blog","tag-books"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1976\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cesspit.net\/drupal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}